Recent content by FargateOne

Indeed. Yesterday I lowered my number of measurements from 9 to 5 (MLP + a kind of X with approximatly 20cm from mlp to each branch of the X and more or less 15cm up and down) bubble around MLP and results are not only good but even better specially for stereo music...I am still hesitating to...

Could you enlighted me, what is it ?

To be honest I'm flabbergasted by your study suggesting that taking the measurement 3 times without moving the microphone or even a single measurement may be sufficient, depending on the room. I would have considered myself a Dirac heretic! What is a relativel low reverberation times room or a...

We were a lot to suppose that too. Now we doubt it is the case for real.The receiver alone sounds good but Arcam didn't have the knowledge to go further with EQ software and Dirac certification process has obviously weaknesses.

Thanks for the detailed answer. I will try the middle solution -5dB + 5dB it could work well. What is the filters resolution (is it what they call «tap») in Arcam is a mistery for me at least. . And yes, following emails from Dirac and Harman DLBC implementation in all Harman receivers lines is...

Sir, it is an amazing extraordinairy review. Awesome as @Flak said. I thank you for all measurements that helps a lot to understand all the methodology and how we can check reak life results with REW. A special thanks for the 2 studies about mic positions etc. In my experience I was beginning to...

yep!

What ?? You're taking vacations??? Shame on you!!!!:rofl:

My 2 fronts spec say 35Hz but in room ,measurements they go to 28issh Hz at -3dB and I have 2 subs so maybe I would benefit of Art. I must say that I am not in a rush since Dirac is not is a rush to solve serious bugs with DLBC version above 3.4.4 and Arcam among other receivers brands

My 2 cents here. Not every consumer can afford Atmos 16-32-64 speakers settings. Many, like me are or must be happy with plain old 5.1 or 7.1 system. And we can enjoy it.. So , I guess Art for 7.1 asks less processing than 32 channels, isn't it? Why we should not get Art then with our not so old...

I have Arcam AVR21 and agree with quite all your post. It appears to me that Art is dealyed because we have prooved that a unique DLBC software in multiple brands isn't reliable. Arcam/Jbl are stuck with a 2 years old firmware version with important bugs in it and no fixes seem to come soon...

Unfortunatly, it is not that easy to answer your questions because you must to read a lot and learn a lot. Acoustics and sound reproduction is not our day to day job. Did you read all the references given in post 1 of this thread...

It is a good thing to ask for help and you will have a lot in this forum. Barrier language forbide me to help you. But it is also a good thing to read. John help index is a condensed teaching of all basics in acoustics . I began to read in 2015 and now I can tell and proove to Dirac that...

First tell us what you know about acoustics, bass responses in confine environment such as home theater, show us screen shuts of your measurements. Null are part of all bass and mid bass frequencies and directly related with boundaries lenght in your room. Physics have laws and null will always...

I read that for DLBC purposes, Umik-2 internal clock would do a great deal of differnce when optimizing a filter. Is it really worth it in comparison of Umik-1?