Recent content by omousis

I agree that a converter chip does not do the whole job... how the DAC is built around is also very important!! Thank you :-)

Do you hear a sound improvement compared to the Motu?

I heard about these delays... Did you find high quality DAC with more channels? I would enjoy finding a 2x5 channels high quality DAC...

Thank you for these advices. They are very useful. I note that you are using the Motu for both your measurements and the audio DAC. I would need to exchange my Topping DM7 against a Motu for convenience unless I accept to unplug/plug the 8 TRS cable during each measurement session... In this...

I see your point... Since I need 8 channels of output, the Focusrite Scalett is not the best match because it has two output channels. I need to upgrade to an 8 channels interface...

Unfortunately the results using WASAPI were even worse... I'm curious to know what kind of unique interface allowed you to fix all the problems...

Unfortunately, the native ASIO drivers Topping DM7 ASIO and Focusrite ASIO do not seem to work together... this is why I use ASIO4ALL.

I thought ASIO4ALL is the right tool for both input and output... I will try the native ASIO driver!

Thank you. I tried what you did: increase the memory size and reduce the sweep time... This is not perfect because I still have about 50% of waste but it is still a significant improvement. The question is how clean must be the sweep recording?

Hi All, I stop this thread as another one has been started earlier by whoareyou on the same topic. Thanks. Olivier.

Hello all, I'm interested to know how the memory allocation for AL can be increased, as I face to similar problems :-) Many thanks in advance, Olivier.

Hello everyone, I'm facing an issue with Audiolense when performing sweep measurements on my multiway system. Most of my measurements (around 4 out of 5) are contaminated by cracks and noise, making it difficult to optimize corrections properly. I'm using ASIO4ALL as both input and output...

Hi Bernt, I will dive into the measurements this weekend and let you know how the correction curve improves based on your recommendation. Thanks so much for your input! Do you think the 15-20 dB gain difference between the low-mid and the other channels might pose a challenge for AL? Also...

Please find the measurement file here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1MibKVSZgAtweb_baM_VDkOXslEgJwmpA?usp=drive_link The Fostex T925 correspond to the treble channel. A 2" Beyma compression is used for the upper midrange... The lower mid-range is 15-20dB lower than the other...

I also attach the FIR filter generated with AL. It is inserted in Roon...