REW Beta Release REW API beta releases

achugh

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Posts
33
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Pioneer Elite SC-37
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Panasonic BP-UB9000P1K
Front Speakers
Klipsch RF7 II
Center Channel Speaker
Klipsch RC64 II
Surround Speakers
Klipsch RB81 II
Surround Back Speakers
KlipschRB81 II
Subwoofers
Tweak City Audio CS18.2 (Dual Subs)
Video Display Device
LG OLED77G2PUA
Other Equipment
miniDSP 2x4HD, UMIK-1
You are measuring a subwoofer full range and REW detects very low output beyond 250Hz relative to noise floor and pops a warning. You can ignore it for subs or measure them with a limited frequency range.
Thank you for confirming my suspicion. I used to work with limited range but after watching your Youtube channel, I started doing full range for subwoofer sweeps. Since REW already knows that this is a subwoofer sweep as the channel selected is LFE, it will be great if REW applies some smart logic to check for distortion via some preference where one can provide the LFE range for distortion check to avoid this dialog box from showing up unless there is really a distortion to worry about. For now, I will continue to ignore this message for full range subwoofer sweeps.

This distortion graph is showing FUNDAMENTAL line plot as a straight line at 100 mark. In some other threads here I have seen this line to be drawn like other harmonic lines. I do not know if this is something I need to worry about or it is also because of the full sweeps on the LFE channel that I need to ignore. Does anyone knows why this 1st harmonic (Fundamental) line is a straight line at 100 value?
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
Does anyone knows why this 1st harmonic (Fundamental) line is a straight line at 100 value?
Because you are plotting the results as a percentage of the fundamental. If you change the Y axis type to SPL, for example, you can see absolute rather than relative levels.
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
Builds updated today (beta 60) with these changes:
  • Added: API /alignment-tool/remove-delay endpoint to control the option to remove time delay
  • Changed: Thiele-Small parameters "Write parameters to file" includes simplified model parameters
  • Changed: Cross corr align improved for measurements with strong reflections
  • Fixed: The alignment tool option to remove delay from the first measurement could be applied after using the alignment tool via the API
  • Fixed: On the Impulse graph dragging the time axis during Offset t=0 was not working
  • Fixed: STI panel was using internal test data
 

JoinUs

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2023
Posts
87
Hey John, Is it possible for REW to do this?


1731986959828.png



If there's a response like this


1731987026931.png



This way, it connects to the middle of the dip and the peak.
Smoothing can make this partly smooth, but I'm wondering if it's possible as if I drew a dotted line.

I can open the csv file in Excel and change the number from the desired frequency to the frequency to make it go on smoothly like that, but I was wondering if it would be possible in REW as well.


Making it soft with Python was helped by GPT, but I thought it would be better if these features were added to REW.
Yellow Original
Green Connect the calculated midpoints peak and dip

1731988067889.png




1731988137197.png

1731988149842.png

1731988162056.png


1/1, 1/3, PSY smoothing, etc. It's definitely different from what I intended.
I don't understand the exact action because it was made by GPT, but I also attached the py file.
 
Last edited:

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
No, it isn't possible for REW to do that. You could experiment with the effect of varying the right hand window on the Impulse graph, drag the "R" marker at the top of the graph.
 

JoinUs

New Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2023
Posts
87
No, it isn't possible for REW to do that. You could experiment with the effect of varying the right hand window on the Impulse graph, drag the "R" marker at the top of the graph.
It was a bit of a different story from gating, but I see.

1732189112242.png


Another suggestion (or question), is it possible to impulse the response from room simulation?
Currently, when I try to export it, I don't have Data. Of course, it's not an impulse, so I can't.

1732189245191.png


But if you generate mp and ep from room simulation and multiply it again, you get the same impulse as room simulation.
It would be nice to have this option (MP+EP with IR) for room simulation export as well.


1732193761269.png


Also, in a typical room simulation, 200 Hz is enough for observation frequency, but is it possible to provide an option to extend it to approximately 400 to 500 Hz?
 
Last edited:

Mike0815

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Posts
39
Location
EU
More  
Other Equipment
CamillaDSP
Added: Multi-input capture has options to align the individual measurements to the first input's measurement using cross correlation alignment and to vector average the individual measurements, both are only available when saving inputs to individual measurements
Hey John,

thanks for adding this.
Would be nice if the resulting vector average would be automatically named like the individual inputs.
E.g: Measurement with 7 mics for left speaker: L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5, L-6, L-7 => L-VectorAverage (or L-VA)
Would prefer the shorter form.
And one more wish: Could there be an option to auto remove the individual L-1, L-2, etc. after VA was generated? Or maybe some button to remove these individual measurements from last measurement run?
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
Would be nice if the resulting vector average would be automatically named like the individual inputs.
E.g: Measurement with 7 mics for left speaker: L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5, L-6, L-7 => L-VectorAverage (or L-VA)
The "-VA" form will be used in the next build.

Could there be an option to auto remove the individual L-1, L-2, etc. after VA was generated?
I have changed the behaviour so that individual measurements do not need to be saved to generate a vector average.
 

LastButNotLeast

New Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2017
Posts
9
Can you make the measurements window resizable? I have to remember to change the resolution of my screen in order to get to the buttons at the bottom. And then, of course, I can't see anything else.
SNIP.png

Thanks.
Michael
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
Builds updated today (beta 61) with these changes:
  • Added: API /measurements/{id}/command entries to Wrap phase and Unwrap phase for a measurement
  • Changed: Multi-input vector average no longer requires saving inputs individually
  • Changed: Improved FSAF band filters from MatLab FSAF V3.1 upload
  • Changed: Flatten the later stages of the IR generated from sweep measurements by padding the captured data with data from the end of the capture
  • Fixed: Sequential channels selection panel on the Measure dialog was limited to 4 rows
 

dcibel

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Posts
292
Thanks John, I will try and find some time this weekend to test the improved FSAF routine.

As a simple feature request, since FSAF supports file format of .wav, .aiff, .flac, .mp3, are you able to also support these file formats in the RTA "open wave file" function?
 

Mike0815

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Posts
39
Location
EU
More  
Other Equipment
CamillaDSP
Changed: Multi-input vector average no longer requires saving inputs individually
Hi John,

observed that in case "Save inputs to individual measurements" is not selected no distortion graph gets shown for the resulting -VA.

Michael
 

Mike0815

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Posts
39
Location
EU
More  
Other Equipment
CamillaDSP
Another wish:
Could a button or so be implemented in every window or a global menu entry (e.g. in Preferences: "Save window positions" ) to save current pop up window positions and screens?(e.g."Make a measurement" )
Here this window always jumps back to screen 0 and every time I have to drag it to my larger screen for every new measurement. (macOS 11.7.10)
 
Last edited:

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
As a simple feature request, since FSAF supports file format of .wav, .aiff, .flac, .mp3, are you able to also support these file formats in the RTA "open wave file" function?
Yes, I have added that for the next build.
 

dcibel

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Posts
292
Thank you!

One more request would be to add M-noise to REW's signal generator and FSAF signal drop-down. Of course I can run the noise from file, it would just be a lot more convenient to have this built-in to REW.
1733586094149.png
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
Here this window always jumps back to screen 0 and every time I have to drag it to my larger screen for every new measurement.
The Measure dialog is owned by the main REW window. It first appears centred on the position of that window, but you can move it elsewhere and afterwards it should appear wherever you have moved it to. Is that not what happens?
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
I will try and find some time this weekend to test the improved FSAF routine.
Note that I have only added Michael's improved filters. He has made many other changes in the subband processing, but porting those changes to Java will take quite a bit more time.
 

John Mulcahy

REW Author
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 3, 2017
Posts
8,111
One more request would be to add M-noise to REW's signal generator
There is no published algorithm to generate the M-noise so that would mean adding the M-noise WAV files to the REW distribution. I don't want to do that.
 

dcibel

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Posts
292
That's unfortunate. I was hoping that something like pink noise with a pre-defined filter that matches the spectrum in my screenshot above would be enough to replicate M-noise functionality, perhaps there's more to it than that. No problem I will just use the freely available audio files.
 

Mike0815

Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2020
Posts
39
Location
EU
More  
Other Equipment
CamillaDSP
It first appears centred on the position of that window, but you can move it elsewhere and afterwards it should appear wherever you have moved it to. Is that not what happens?
Nope, REWˋs main window starts up at my notebook's screen and when I drag it to my larger monitor the secondary windows appear every time at notebook's screen.
 
Last edited:

Draki

Registered
Joined
May 23, 2017
Posts
6
I haven't used this feature for a while, so I am obviously missing something: It used to be possible to adjust the FR gain of a measurement (in the Controls I think).
Very useful for comparison with imported measurements made on a different dB level etc.

Now I can't find that feature in the current version. Is it still possible?
 
Top Bottom