New Audiolense releases

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
@juicehifi - In my case, it's approaching a year since paying the extended support and upgrade fee.
Although there are no showstopper defects, it would have been nice to receive a program update addressing some of the issues / enhancements discussed over the course of that year.

Can you provide any information as to when your schedule will allow for releasing a program update?

I realize and appreciate that a product takes time and effort to support, but I would also like to receive some type of product improvements from time to time.
Thanks
I can understand why you’re asking. And I guess some progress reporting is due here.

The plan for the next release is direct resampling of correction filters and Atmos support.

This has not been the best year for Audiolense development with documented progress. About a year ago I was working on an API for the convolver to enable 3rd party GUI development. Unfortunately that work hasn’t surfaced yet. I need to do at least one more rotation. Then some of you guys may be able to make your own GUI. And then I have one or two GUI ideas in my own.

By the start of this year I was forced to abandon my old provider of accounting system and webstore, which took most of the available Audiolense time in the first half year. That job isn’t fully completed yet, but when I’m done I will have a very effective system for most of the paperwork associated with this small business … and I expect it to be that way for years to come. So there has been plenty of development there, just not on the software. When I’m done I will be able to spend most of the time on development and support, which is what I really want to spend time on.

This autumn I have also been very busy with my other job, so progress has been a bit slower than normal for this time of the year. But I have good hopes of getting the new release out by end of January.
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
Audiolense 6.22 is out


Audiolense 6.22 (64 bit)

Audiolense 6.22 (32 bit)

  • New optional correction filter resampling. The time duration of the filter is kept intact on the resampling, so there will be no truncation of the low frequency correction. The frequency response is extended on upsampling, but frequency and time domain behavior is practically identical within the common bandwidth. The upsampling supports rates up to 5.6 million Hz. Upsampling to very high frequencies will be disabled when an upsampling will exceed the maximum filter-length, which is limited by the capacity of the math library used in Audiolense. The solution then is to shorten the filter length in the correction procecure designer until the desired sample rate is enabled.
  • Added phase view, with wrapped and unwrapped phase.
  • Modified draw charts functions to support phase switching.
  • Removed delete rows in speaker setup since it caused unanticipated problems. The delete button gets the job done…
  • Updated the help file, which now only comes as a PDF.
 

whoareyou

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2021
Posts
215
More  
Main Amp
Benchmark AHB2
Additional Amp
ATI AT525NC
DAC
Exasound E38
Computer Audio
JRiver
Front Speakers
Psb synchrony one
Center Channel Speaker
PSB synchrony one C
Surround Speakers
Revel m105
HI. To look at new features, I installed demo version (my license has expired). With same settings, filters, etc. my simulations are very different. For example ....
Same correction filter ("10"), target, setup, measurement, polarity correction disabled . Just doing a quick sanity check but you should get the idea of what I see (I hope).
I've upgraded several times prior to this and never had this happen to me. Suggestions?

Also, just a small request. When running program in demo mode it always seems to destroy all of the current correction filters. Anyway you can change program so that it doesn't wipe them out?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Ver622.png
    Ver622.png
    43.5 KB · Views: 27
  • Ver621.png
    Ver621.png
    37.9 KB · Views: 28
  • juicehifi.zip
    7.2 MB · Views: 65

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
Mine are identical as before, but if you could send me the measurement file you were using here I will check this out.
 

whoareyou

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2021
Posts
215
More  
Main Amp
Benchmark AHB2
Additional Amp
ATI AT525NC
DAC
Exasound E38
Computer Audio
JRiver
Front Speakers
Psb synchrony one
Center Channel Speaker
PSB synchrony one C
Surround Speakers
Revel m105
Mine are identical as before, but if you could send me the measurement file you were using here I will check this out.
Files should be in attached zip of my original post. Thanks

Edit: I just looked everything over once again and can't find any different settings. Frequency simulations are also different and if you look at the step simulation each speaker looks kind of like a linear phase rather than Minimum phase response. The target included with the zip file is minimum phase.
 
Last edited:

sledwards

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Posts
32
Location
Wake Forest, NC
I concur that something is going on with 6.22. See attached freq resp plots. Created with the same correction procedures.
 

Attachments

  • 6.21 freq resp.jpg
    6.21 freq resp.jpg
    187.2 KB · Views: 31
  • 6.22 freq resp.jpg
    6.22 freq resp.jpg
    186 KB · Views: 32

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
Yes this doesn’t look right. I’ll give it a try tomorrow. If I don’t find it fast then, it may take a couple of weeks.
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
[31 jul 2024]

Audiolense 6.23 (64 bit)
Audiolense 6.23 (32 bit)


• A driver alignment error was unfortunately introduced in 6.22, which is fixed now.
• Fixed a bug related to manual speaker/driver delay entry.

I've put the same relase date on this, and 6.22 should not be used when digital crossovers are used.

Thank you @whoareyou and @sledwards for pointing out the problem.
 

sledwards

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Posts
32
Location
Wake Forest, NC
@juicehifi

I was trying to test out the new Resample Correction feature and am wondering what I may be doing wrong. When I select the output rate (96kHz or any other value), I get the error shown in the attached file.

Steve
 

Attachments

  • resample error.jpg
    resample error.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 18

Rsg11

Registered
Joined
Oct 29, 2023
Posts
1
@juicehifi

I was trying to test out the new Resample Correction feature and am wondering what I may be doing wrong. When I select the output rate (96kHz or any other value), I get the error shown in the attached file.

Steve
I suspect this error is due to the filter length, as described in the notes for the 6.22 release:

  • New optional correction filter resampling. The time duration of the filter is kept intact on the resampling, so there will be no truncation of the low frequency correction. The frequency response is extended on upsampling, but frequency and time domain behavior is practically identical within the common bandwidth. The upsampling supports rates up to 5.6 million Hz. Upsampling to very high frequencies will be disabled when an upsampling will exceed the maximum filter-length, which is limited by the capacity of the math library used in Audiolense. The solution then is to shorten the filter length in the correction procecure designer until the desired sample rate is enabled.
 

sledwards

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Posts
32
Location
Wake Forest, NC
@Rsg11

Thanks, didn't quite understand the warning. It seems like the best solution after playing with this feature is just to write out correction filters with no upsampling (48kHz in my case) at the highest filter length available in the correction procedure designer (131072). I use HQPlayer for convolution, and it will expand high frequency when the music base sample rate exceeds 48kHz. Please correct me if this thinking seems flawed.
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
@juicehifi

I was trying to test out the new Resample Correction feature and am wondering what I may be doing wrong. When I select the output rate (96kHz or any other value), I get the error shown in the attached file.

Steve

Hi Steve,

You have stumbled over a bug. I am not able to reproduce it here. Could you be so kind and send me your measurement, target and all the correction details?
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
[31 jul 2024]

  • Beta release. Consider it a beta release for now. I’ll remove this remark if it turns out all right.
  • A peak-finding procedure had to be reworked to function properly with the new resampling. This procedure is widely used for speaker and crossover alignment, therefore the beta status for now.
  • A small rounding error on the peak finder was discovered, the fix may lead to improved alignments in some setups.
  • Detected a small target display error that was fixed.
  • Disabled saving of frequency range in the charts, which has caused problems for users frequently.
Audiolense 6.24 (64 bit)
Audiolense 6.24 (32 bit)
 

sledwards

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2018
Posts
32
Location
Wake Forest, NC
@juicehifi

The new resample filter is working well when I compare the magnitude of the .wav filters (96kHz and 192 kHz) to the correction filters. All curves match well. However, when I compare the phase of the resampled filters to the correction filters, I see differences as shown in the attached plots. Should not the resampled filter phase match that of the correction filters?

Steve
 

Attachments

  • phase wrapped.jpg
    phase wrapped.jpg
    264.1 KB · Views: 24
  • phase unwrapped.jpg
    phase unwrapped.jpg
    250.1 KB · Views: 23

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
They are probably a lot closer thann this. … but this view is a wrapped phase. In the unwrapped, the top will likely be faster since the high end has been extended.

Personally I mostly look at the time domain and frequency domain.

I am happy if the peak matches and the frequency domain looks clean. And regarding clean … I’ve spent more than a few weeks trying out various alternatives. The difference from before is most unlikely to be audible in most imstances, but in the long run technical quality will get the upper hand. If it does not improve sound quality for the majority, it may give a more predictably & excellent result for everybody. So I aim for technical perfection when I attach such issues, regardless of what I believe of the threshold of hearing and sonic impact short term.
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
It appears that the resampling wasn't complete yet...

[31 jul 2024]

  • Beta release. Consider it a beta release for now. I’ll remove this remark if it turns out all right.
  • Corrections for the native frequency was not saved for all correction formats. This has been fixed.
Audiolense 6.25 (64 bit)
Audiolense 6.25 (32 bit)
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
It appears that the resampling wasn't complete yet...

[31 jul 2024]

  • Beta release. Consider it a beta release for now. I’ll remove this remark if it turns out all right.
  • Corrections for the native frequency was not saved for all correction formats. This has been fixed.
Audiolense 6.25 (64 bit)
Audiolense 6.25 (32 bit)
There are no errors reported on 6.25, so I assume all the important bugs have been taken care of.
 

whoareyou

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2021
Posts
215
More  
Main Amp
Benchmark AHB2
Additional Amp
ATI AT525NC
DAC
Exasound E38
Computer Audio
JRiver
Front Speakers
Psb synchrony one
Center Channel Speaker
PSB synchrony one C
Surround Speakers
Revel m105
When taking measurements, 6.25 AL has closed without any type of error message on several occasions. No critical error messages or warning displays prior to AL shutting down.
I simply restart the app and measurment and then all is good again.

Never had this happen before, but now with 6.25 it's happened on several occassions. Motu MK-5 and Isemcon microphone, all ASIO.

Is there any logging that can be looked at if this happens again? It's very sproadic, but quite annoying and I never had this occur before 6.25.
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
I do not recall any changes in the recording for a long time. But Windows and dotNet sometimes work in misterious ways.

If I were you I would measure with the release that is more stable on measurements and load it into the most recent release. And if you see a pattern in the problems that I can work on I’m all ears.
 

Urs

New Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2021
Posts
14
When taking measurements, 6.25 AL has closed without any type of error message on several occasions. No critical error messages or warning displays prior to AL shutting down.
I simply restart the app and measurment and then all is good again.

Never had this happen before, but now with 6.25 it's happened on several occassions. Motu MK-5 and Isemcon microphone, all ASIO.

Is there any logging that can be looked at if this happens again? It's very sproadic, but quite annoying and I never had this occur before 6.25.
This happened to me also just recently. But only twice and I am using v6.22. Therefore I am more looking at Windows than at Audiolense (or its latest updates)
 

juicehifi

Audiolense
Staff member
Thread Starter
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Posts
800
[26 oct 2024]

Audiolense convolver 1.8.exe

Extended volume control. Now you can adjust the volume without exiting the fullscreen.

image-1.jpg


Mouse functions has been implemented for better access to the volume control. There are now the following options:

  • Tray icon and form only (the same as before)
  • show volume control on mousemove – on fullscreen only
  • show volume control on mousemove – everywhere
  • Volume and mute with mouse wheel and wheel button on fullscreen only
  • Volume and mute with mouse wheel and wheel button everywhere
A minimised version of the volume control is displayed when the volume is activated from outside the tray icon / form. This minimised version can be dragged by the mouse to a desired location and will remember the location.

In addition:

  • Fixed a couple of screen scaling issues on rarely used forms.
  • Fixed a broken link to the help file.
  • Fixed a bug on the form moving feature that often led to reset the location. Various minor fixes to smoothen the user experience.
Note: Your current settings will be overwritten when the convolver is started for the first time.
 

e1guapo

New Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2022
Posts
13
More  
Other Amp
Drop THX AAA 789
DAC
Merging+Anubis, Denafrips Ares II, SPL Phonitor One d
Computer Audio
HQPlayer Embedded / Desktop, Roon
Streaming Equipment
iFi ZEN Stream
Streaming Subscriptions
Qobuz, Tidal, Apple Music
Front Speakers
PreSonus E5 XT
Center Channel Speaker
PreSonus E44
Surround Speakers
PreSonus E3.5
Rear Height Speakers
PreSonus E3.5
Subwoofers
PreSonus E8
Other Speakers
Sennheiser HD820, HD650, Beyerdynamic DT880 Pro
Other Equipment
Audiolense XO, SoundID Reference

whoareyou

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2021
Posts
215
More  
Main Amp
Benchmark AHB2
Additional Amp
ATI AT525NC
DAC
Exasound E38
Computer Audio
JRiver
Front Speakers
Psb synchrony one
Center Channel Speaker
PSB synchrony one C
Surround Speakers
Revel m105
Thank you so much Dr Bernt!
Any chance you can implement a user configurable global background color for the graphs? This was discussed long time ago, and you thought it was possible. I know it's not really new "functionallity", but when you are dealing with multiples of speakers, like Atmos, some of the individual speaker's measurements disappear into that yellow background . It's a real pain to have to go and change this setting for every graph, and the change is not persisted. Constantly changing this setting is a real pain in the neck.
 
Top Bottom