Is this a good goal? How to get there?

2Sunny

Registered
Thread Starter
Joined
Apr 4, 2025
Posts
11
More  
Preamp, Processor or Receiver
Sony STR AZ5000ES
Main Amp
OutLaw 2220 x 3
Universal / Blu-ray / CD Player
Sony UBP-X700
Streaming Equipment
AppleTV (3rd gen)
Streaming Subscriptions
Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, Max, Hulu, Tidal, Spotify
Front Speakers
Revel Performa F226Be
Center Channel Speaker
Ascend Acoustic Duo V2 LCR
Surround Speakers
Revel M16
Front Height Speakers
SVS Prime Elevation
Rear Height Speakers
Klipsch RP-500SA II
Subwoofers
SVS SB-1000 (2)
Video Display Device
Sony A95L 65" TV
Cables
Zeskit Lite
Other Equipment
Verizon FIOS Media Server
First a hearty thanks to any that reply as I'm fully aware that any input is meant with the best intentions and comes from average Joe's like myself who are just out to have fun or so I hope :)

Anyways, I started searching for the word "good" in titles to try and figure out what good really means, and all the results offer links to gobs of reading. I get it; most folks here would prefer users not try taking shortcuts, but rather take the time to learn how to do it right what ever "right" means to them.

But . . . and please forgive me here if you disagree . . . but

This is a fun endeavor for me. I'm retired and recovering from cancer and am somewhat house-bound at the moment so looking for fun projects to occupy my time. I have a great home theater set up and recently invested a lot of money in upgrading the speakers and receiver and added 3 monoblock amps, but now I'm curious to try and use my newly purchased UMIK-1 and REW to see if there aren't changes I can make to improve the sound in my room based on objective measurements. It's critical to note that I am extremely happy with what I have; I'm merely curious and interested in playing around with REW FOR FUN. BUT . . . I don't want to spend hours more reading various online links that may or may not have small nuggets of useful information, but mostly are filled with information that is simply not necessary. As an example there is this link frequently touted here. It's more than a decade old and recommends using a soundcard like the M-Audio, which I'm pretty sure most folks here do NOT use. (Correct me if I'm wrong on that)


So, with that as a background what I think I'm interested in doing is 2 fold. First, set a goal of trying to get as close as possible to reproducing the below graph in my own room, and second, make sure that the measurements I'm taking are meaningful.

Here then are my first questions:

1) Is that a reasonable goal?
2) Are the measurements I took meaningful if not how do I make them meaningful?
3) Is there someway to get REW to let me add LFE to L+R for a combined reading or is averaging readings the only method for combining channels?

EDIT: The graphs from my room are 1/12 smoothing.

1568267092007-png.png




REW.1.4.10.25.jpg


IMG_3125.JPG


IMG_3124.JPG
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Your L+R measurement looks fine, but it is generally best to measure speakers individually to avoid comb filtering effects from small differences in the mic distance to each speaker or different processor channel delay settings.

Your sub measurement is OK, but it has poor signal-to-noise because it covers an unnecessarily wide frequency range. It also looks quite high, which may be a consequence of the automatic 10 dB gain processors apply to signals on the LFE channel. On the REW Measure dialog there are options to automatically use a lower end frequency for LFE measurements and automatically drop the LFE level by 10 dB to produce results which can be directly compared with measurements of other speakers.

A general downward slope in the response is fairly typical and often subjectively favoured, but how much slope there is depends on the absorption and dispersion characteristics of the room and its surfaces. It is more of an outcome than a target. Probably best to focus on tackling low frequency peaks in the responses first.
 
Back
Top