I may still not understand your question and sorry if not, but here goes ...
In the case of not having speakers equidistant from side walls the author is pointing out that, assuming the listener remains equidistant from each speaker, by having a different path length difference between direct and reflected sound for each, there will be a different center frequency of the dip (out of phase cancellation) caused by each. Often, as in the example provided in your link, this occurs in the lower registers when both speakers can be playing the same frequency at the same time, so the listener will hear more of the intended sound as it's now being cancelled for just one of sources rather than both at the same time. So the author's intent was to point out one way to mitigate the negative effect of domestic room wall bounce caused phase cancellations that will exist.
In contrast, if starting with 2 equidistant speakers, by electronically delaying one speaker so the arrival time of the direct sound from each is longer equal, phase cancellation is being unnecessarily created (when both are playing the same frequency at the same time) along with other more noticeable unwanted effects.
Changing the arrival time of the direct sound through electonic delay also does nothing to change the frequency that will be affected by the wall bounce cancellations. The difference in path lengths of direct and reflected sounds remains the same.