Hi,
John Mulcahy
It is supported but there is a bug which is preventing the paths being saved properly (unless the files have a sensitivitydBFS entry). I have fixed it for the next build. I also noticed the fullScaleSineVrms field was mislabelled fullScalSineVrms, that has also been fixed in the next build.Seems like the current API doesn't support "separateCalFileForEachInput": true
That wouldn't be a unit, it would need a separate export for the group delay graph. I'll add it to the todo list.Would you think of adding an unit of exportation of group delay,which can be imported in other simulation tools?
Why would a reversed sweep increase test result stability? Reversing the sweep would mean harmonic distortion could no longer be extracted.Measure the SPL and Imp,adding a sweep signal range from 20kHz~20Hz(from high to low) might increase stability of the test result
But it would be more inline with the impulse graphReversing the sweep would mean harmonic distortion could no longer be extracted
Thanks! Just to double confirm, can you check my assumption below is correct? API document doesn't tell much about thisIt is supported but there is a bug which is preventing the paths being saved properly (unless the files have a sensitivitydBFS entry). I have fixed it for the next build. I also noticed the fullScaleSineVrms field was mislabelled fullScalSineVrms, that has also been fixed in the next build.
I have rebuilt the macOS installer to fix that, if you download again it should be OK.Moving measurements around the screen with mouse right-click don't work anymore on Beta 58, this is on Mac.
Thanks works again...I have rebuilt the macOS installer to fix that, if you download again it should be OK.
I can add options for that, with a couple of caveats:Could you add an option to automatically cross correlate to the first mic and then to vector average the correlated?
Is that on Linux? I can't reproduce that behaviour on Windows.In the measurement setup, when entering the number of measurement repeats, if you don't hit the Enter key in the box and just click off the drop-down, the number of repeats isn't updated.
I don't understand that question.Is it impossible to make each measurement's thumbnail selected in the SPL tab as it is in the current beta?
FDW and MTW results are log spaced at 96 PPO and so have inherent smoothing of 1/48 octave.Does FDW and MTW have to be smoothed unconditionally? Can't I disable this?
No, I just used the Target Settings to simulate a filter I want to apply to the speaker response, not necessarily to equalise the speaker's response or generate measurement from filters which in this use case, would be flat. It is the generate measurement from target shape that I used but as you said, it only produces a magnitude response.Did you use Generate measurement from filters, which will produce an impulse response from the current filter settings, or Generate measurement from target shape, which only produces a magnitude response?
Using that option produces a flat line. I am trying to use EQ more as a crossover simulator "without equalising/matching the speaker response against the target curve using PK filters for an example" to better understand its behavior.See above, use Generate measurement from filters.