I'm in favor of going back to unsmoothed.In recent builds it reverts to unsmoothed, previously it kept 1/48. I can do either and don't mind which, happy to hear what folk think makes most sense.
I'm in favor of going back to unsmoothed.In recent builds it reverts to unsmoothed, previously it kept 1/48. I can do either and don't mind which, happy to hear what folk think makes most sense.
Unlikely. Are you using file-based preferences or (assuming Windows) registry-based? You can see info about how and where preferences are stored in the Welcome help topic in the application.I've lost all my settings in REW. Is it possible that a Java update would do that?
Thank you!I have added mouse wheel support for the next build.
I'm not surprised. Without one of those Logitech free-wheeling mouse wheels it's probably nearly impossible to spam inputs hard enough to trigger it. If I turn it back to not free-wheel like a normal mouse I can't make it happen.I can't reproduce that but I have added some mitigations for the next build.
Since you can't even remove 1/48 while FDW is active and it also adds the FDW tag to the measurement, I almost want to say it shouldn't even be labeled as smoothed in the first place. Smoothing is a purely a visual thing for the user (and EQ targeting I guess), and FDW actually has an impact on arithmetic and stuff, so it might be better to leave them independent even if it meant toggling 1/48 on an FDW measurement were to effectively not do anything at all. I'm not aware of any other way to force a measurement to be 96 PPO or vice versa, so I don't know if or how important it is to make that distinction. I could be totally off base here, just speaking from my limited understanding as a user.There isn't a way for REW to know whether the 1/48 smoothing was applied manually or imposed by the 96 PPO log spaced conversion that happens as part of applying the FDW. 1/48 octave smoothing is as close to unsmoothed as 96 PPO data can get, if FDW is removed REW may revert to a linear spaced measurement and then there is a decision about whether to keep the 1/48 octave smoothing or remove smoothing. In recent builds it reverts to unsmoothed, previously it kept 1/48. I can do either and don't mind which, happy to hear what folk think makes most sense.
It's registry based. I had a Java runtime update and when I've opened REW after I've realized all my settings had been reverted to defaults. I didn't do that intentionally.Unlikely. Are you using file-based preferences or (assuming Windows) registry-based? You can see info about how and where preferences are stored in the Welcome help topic in the application.
I don't see that behaviour. Nothing happens if I double click on an area of the filename that isn't text.However, if you double click in a part that isn't occupied by text, like in this picture,
the dialog box closes but it doesn't actually open the file
The only way I can think of for that to happen is if the JavaSoft prefs key was removed somehow during the update. I've never seen that though.It's registry based. I had a Java runtime update and when I've opened REW after I've realized all my settings had been reverted to defaults. I didn't do that intentionally.
Is there any way to restore my settings? HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Prefs\room eq wizard seems to contain only current settings.
Thanks. I have fixed that for the next build. In the meantime make sure the mode is not sequential before you select file playback.This one popped up during "measurement from file" right after a sweep file was selected (ea54)
It looks like it only happens with the first file in the list, but it's very consistent for me on the latest Windows 10 and REW.I don't see that behaviour. Nothing happens if I double click on an area of the filename that isn't text.
Not for me, also latest Win 10. Perhaps it's a feature of your mouseIt looks like it only happens with the first file in the list, but it's very consistent for me on the latest Windows 10 and REW.
Doesn't happen for me either, latest Win 10.Not for me, also latest Win 10.
John please stop adding special cases that make REW do weird stuff only on my desktop!Not for me, also latest Win 10. Perhaps it's a feature of your mouse
That will be because that was the length of the impulse response. For longer responses at higher sample rates use longer sweeps.The highest number of samples offered to export is 131,072, yet sample rates offered are up to 1,536 kHz
Yes, that is the intended behaviour. The available options are a single measurement of one channel, repeated measurements of one channel or a single measurement of a sequence of channels. For your case easiest would be to do 3 repeats of left then 3 repeats of right.Is this the intended behaviour? How would I take three measurements each of the left and right channel (six measurements all up)?
and when " Align t=0 to a sampling instant" is ticked in preferences?The IR start time has sample interval resolution, it finds the sample which first exceeds the threshold. If the previous start time was at a fractional sample position the new alignment will slightly change the sample values, which may shift the start time by one sample if the rate of change near the start is low, which it often is for a low bandwidth source.
Per the help, "If Align t=0 to a sampling instant is selected any change to the impulse response t=0 position will include any fractional sample shift necessary to ensure t=0 occurs at a sampling instant". Since the IR start is picked from a sample value it is already at a sampling instant and will not need any fractional sample shift.when " Align t=0 to a sampling instant" is ticked in preferences?